Randomized Control Trial Free Essay Example, 2000 words

Randomized Control Trial (RCT) is recognized widely as the best way of making a comparison between the different modes of treatment and how effective they are. Therefore, I am not of the opinion that the results of the Random Control Trial conducted by Ebenbichler et al are the only method of deriving information about the particular intervention. Several trials and research have found that there are other viable methods of managing Calcific Tendinitis that can lead to healing (Maxwell 1992, p. 421). Additionally, other research methods might have glaring differences that suggest different hypotheses and therefore without the application of the meticulous criteria set by RCT, the degree of certainty of an outcome can be limited. The results are influenced by either an over or underestimated the relationship between the intervention and the condition being studied. It is important to note that Randomized Control Trials may at times be biased if poorly performed, and have deficiencies in the report it gives. The discrepancy that may be found in different aspects of the study that should be reported and those that are reported should be known (Begg et al 1996, p. 637) thereby requiring readers to make a judgment based on what has already been reported and are in the domain of the public. We will write a custom essay sample on Randomized Control Trial or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now I think one obvious inadequacy of the research carried out by Ebenbichler et al (1999) is that they fail to specify the type of randomization they adopted for their study and how they have narrowed down to the seventy trialists. The researchers state that they enrolled seventy patients of whom sixty-three participated in the study. There were thirty-two shoulders that participated in the genuine ultrasound treatment and twenty-nine in the fake ultrasound treatment out of the sixty-one that completed the study. The simple randomization that Ebenbichler et al have adopted is less reliable as compared to the stratified randomization that looks appropriate in such circumstances where there may be variables. This method follows the fundamental principle of randomization in which every individual has the same chance of being allocated into the groups.